Olympic surfing judge removed amidst controversy over social media photo
The International Surfing Association (ISA) has removed Australian judge Ben Lowe from the judging panel at the Paris 2024 Olympics.
The decision comes after a photo surfaced on social media showing Lowe posing with Australian Olympic surfer Ethan Ewing and coach Bede Durbidge.
The ISA deemed this interaction inappropriate, citing the need to maintain the integrity and fairness of the competition.
The contentious photo, captioned “These 3 Straddie boys doing their stuff at the Olympics,” references the trio’s shared background from North Stradbroke Island, a small community off the coast of Brisbane.
While the image may seem innocent, the ISA’s decision underscores the strict ethical standards expected of Olympic judges.
Lowe, a seasoned judge with 18 years of experience in the World Surf League (WSL), is known for his reserved and professional demeanor.
However, this incident has cast a shadow over his reputation, especially given the heightened scrutiny at the Olympics.
Brazilian surf fans and media have particularly vocalized their discontent, suggesting a potential bias against Brazilian surfers.
Brazilian big wave surfer and TV commentator Pedro Scooby drew parallels to a hypothetical scenario in football, highlighting the inappropriateness of such interactions.
Scooby’s comments reflect a broader sentiment of mistrust in the Brazilian surfing community, particularly following allegations from the Tokyo 2020 Olympics where Lowe was accused of underscoring Gabriel Medina.
These allegations were originally reported by Brazilian surf media and fueled by Scooby, who claimed that Lowe consistently gave lower scores to Medina compared to his opponents.
Despite the limited sample size from Tokyo, this narrative has persisted among Brazilian fans, intensifying the backlash against Lowe following the recent photo.
An Overall Low Scorer
To assess the validity of these claims, an Anglo-Saxon media analysis of Lowe’s scoring at the Paris 2024 Olympics was conducted.
The findings revealed that Lowe generally underscored waves, but his bias did not specifically target Brazilian surfers.
In fact, his scores for Australian surfers were, on average, lower than those for Brazilians.
This data suggests that while Lowe tends to be a stringent scorer, there is no clear evidence of favoritism against any particular nationality.
The ISA’s swift action to remove Lowe aims to eliminate any perception of bias and uphold the competition’s integrity.
However, this incident highlights the fine line judges must walk in maintaining professionalism and impartiality, especially in a close-knit community like competitive surfing.
The WSL, aware of the situation, has expressed its support for the ISA’s decision and indicated that it will review the matter in relation to its own officiating standards.
The incident reminds us of the importance of adhering to ethical guidelines, particularly in the high-stakes environment of the Olympics.
For Ben Lowe, this situation is a significant blow, potentially affecting his future in judging.
Yet, it also serves as a critical lesson for all involved in the sport.
In the social media era, the surfing world is small and interconnected, and even seemingly benign interactions can have far-reaching consequences in the context of competitive fairness and public perception.
As the surfing competition continues, ISA’s focus will undoubtedly remain on ensuring that all judges adhere strictly to ethical standards, preserving the sport’s integrity at the Olympic level.
Fairness is crucial for the credibility of competitive surfing. Without it, fans and spectators will inevitably lose faith in the sport.
